|
Post by John Stockton on Jun 25, 2016 20:50:53 GMT -5
Sacramento Kings BOS 2018 1st for Seattle Supersonics
NOP 1st 2018 SEA 2nd 2019
|
|
|
Post by John Stockton on Jun 25, 2016 21:01:14 GMT -5
Seattle accepts this trade
|
|
Paul Pierce
Chicago Bulls
Posts: 2,818
Likes: 1,143
Total Bank: 6,050
|
Post by Paul Pierce on Jun 25, 2016 23:22:12 GMT -5
nice trade seatle
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2016 14:35:53 GMT -5
Accept
|
|
|
Post by John Stockton on Jun 26, 2016 15:53:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Justin Timberlake on Jun 26, 2016 16:03:15 GMT -5
"Doc reject" for me. A potentially Russell, Millsap and JV less Boston for a primed and ready BK team? My money is on Billy being A LOT better.
Sorry guys
|
|
Steve Jobs
Oklahoma City Thunder
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 2,107
Total Bank: 50,500
|
Post by Steve Jobs on Jun 26, 2016 19:37:32 GMT -5
Agree with Justin here. Not sure it's rejectable though, just that this trade is stupid.
|
|
|
Post by John Stockton on Jun 26, 2016 19:44:37 GMT -5
Not sure it's rejectable though lets focus on this part. it is the off season!!
|
|
|
Post by Colin Loftin on Jun 27, 2016 0:39:17 GMT -5
Can we maybe get some reasoning from Doc on why he thinks the Pelicans pick is going to be worth more than the Celtics one? Otherwise it makes no sense to do it
|
|
Kong
Posts: 147
Likes: 111
|
Post by Kong on Jun 27, 2016 0:48:54 GMT -5
Meh, don't see how this is worse than trading 19th + 2 low 2nds and 2nd round talent for 8th. This is a trade about potential scenerios and I don't see how it is a lock that Pelicans will be better than Celtics.
|
|
|
Post by Justin Timberlake on Jun 27, 2016 1:03:52 GMT -5
Meh, don't see how this is worse than trading 19th + 2 low 2nds and 2nd round talent for 8th. This is a trade about potential scenerios and I don't see how it is a lock that Pelicans will be better than Celtics. Could we get a reasoning on behalf of the Sonics as well?
|
|
Kong
Posts: 147
Likes: 111
|
Post by Kong on Jun 27, 2016 1:18:59 GMT -5
Personally, I think Celtics and Pelicans have equally good rosters at the moment but I think Billy will spend enough time to take his team to the next level. Not saying Billy is a better GM than Red but I think he has more in the line considering he owns the league and stuff.
I mean, considering he spends so much time in the league because he owns it, I think he will probably spend enough time to be respected as owner and capable GM. That's about it.
|
|
billy
Miami Heat
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 6,145
Total Bank: 3,050
|
Post by billy on Jun 27, 2016 7:59:10 GMT -5
Don't think it's good for me to vote on this trade, I'm a bit biased about which pick I think will be better.
|
|
|
Post by Colin Loftin on Jun 27, 2016 9:15:01 GMT -5
Meh, don't see how this is worse than trading 19th + 2 low 2nds and 2nd round talent for 8th. This is a trade about potential scenerios and I don't see how it is a lock that Pelicans will be better than Celtics. Lol. Dang man. No need to be doing that. Nobody saying its a bad trade. It's just weird to trade 1st round picks straight up for each other in the same draft year. The only reason would be if each team thinks the other draft pick is definitely going to be more valuable. Hence my asking Doc for some additional reasoning.
|
|
|
Post by Brown Cobb IV on Jun 27, 2016 10:14:05 GMT -5
Those who have knowledge don't predict. Those who predict, don't have knowledge.
|
|
Kong
Posts: 147
Likes: 111
|
Post by Kong on Jun 27, 2016 11:54:25 GMT -5
Sort of obvious why Doc might be doing this deal though. He doesn't know what pick will be better but he will take the 2nd.
|
|
|
Post by Justin Timberlake on Jun 27, 2016 12:27:39 GMT -5
Sort of obvious why Doc might be doing this deal though. He doesn't know what pick will be better but he will take the 2nd. I based my decision on what I know now. Billy has Kawhi, AG, picks, WCS, Mudiay, Gobert, etc. Boston will have player options on JV and Millsap and Russell's contract is expiring after this next season. Billy's team is trending up, with youth and talent. Boston's future is in limbo, with expiring contracts, no youth and no picks. Also, Doc has also proven himself to be a little ill-advised at times to put it lightly hahaha. That's why I voted the way I did
|
|
|
Post by Colin Loftin on Jun 27, 2016 12:53:56 GMT -5
Sort of obvious why Doc might be doing this deal though. He doesn't know what pick will be better but he will take the 2nd. If a 2nd round pick is the only reason he's making this trade that's dumber than any other reason he could've stated. I'm not voting one way or the other until I hear more from Doc.
|
|
Kong
Posts: 147
Likes: 111
|
Post by Kong on Jun 27, 2016 14:04:19 GMT -5
Don't see how this is dumb and the other trade isn't. I understand you don't want to mix them but to me it is part of the same problem.
|
|
|
Post by Colin Loftin on Jun 27, 2016 14:22:16 GMT -5
Don't see how this is dumb and the other trade isn't. I understand you don't want to mix them but to me it is part of the same problem. I didn't say that. I have said it doesn't make sense, because unless he has a specific reason for thinking that the Pelicans are going to be worse than the Celtics in 2017-2018 then it does not make sense to swap draft picks in the same year. That's all I have said. I haven't said that the trade is dumb. I haven't compared it with any other trades. They are irrelevant to this one. All I have said, is that if he is solely doing it for a 2019 2nd round draft pick then his reasoning is dumb. I am not concerned with, nor considering, any other trade when voting on this one. He (hopefully) has a reason for making any trade he is involved in. The only thing I'm asking for, and I don't know how to state it any more clearly, is for Doc's reasons for thinking the Pelicans pick will be more valuable.
|
|
Kong
Posts: 147
Likes: 111
|
Post by Kong on Jun 27, 2016 15:08:33 GMT -5
Meh. To me at this point it is all about seing who gets his doc trade approved and who doesnt. Not speaking about the last 2 trades but in general. I think he likes trading more than he likes thinking deeply about the trades he does and i think most would agree with what i am saying even if they wont admit it and like the next member quoting my post instead.
|
|
|
Post by Colin Loftin on Jun 27, 2016 15:17:52 GMT -5
Meh. To me at this point it is all about seing who gets his doc trade approved and who doesnt. Not speaking about the last 2 trades but in general. I think he likes trading more than he likes thinking deeply about the trades he does and i think most would agree with what i am saying even if they wont admit it and like the next member quoting my post instead. lol, I liked all your posts. Better? :)
|
|
Kong
Posts: 147
Likes: 111
|
Post by Kong on Jun 27, 2016 15:19:33 GMT -5
But for real. You know I am right. I wont go on to pretend there is more logic in doc reasoning that there actually is. Actually, i am pretty sure he has a logic. Just post every trade because he will only get good trades accepted because of the whole doc rejected thing.
|
|
|
Post by Colin Loftin on Jun 27, 2016 15:31:13 GMT -5
@docrivers101 We need some additional reasoning :)
|
|
|
Post by Justin Timberlake on Jun 27, 2016 15:39:03 GMT -5
Isn't the 24hr rule into effect? Or are we counting Doc's lack of explanation as an illegitimate acceptance?
|
|
billy
Miami Heat
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 6,145
Total Bank: 3,050
|
Post by billy on Jun 27, 2016 15:44:43 GMT -5
Isn't the 24hr rule into effect Correct. Trade rejected.
|
|