Pete Maravich
 Washington Wizards
Posts: 1,264 
Likes: 772
Total Bank: 55,000
|
Post by Pete Maravich on Dec 30, 2016 19:53:18 GMT -5
Toronto receives: Tyson Chandler $19,250,000 $21,000,000 $22,750,000 $24,500,000'20 BOS 1st rd pick
Post Trade Salary - $93,476,063
Washington receives:
'20 TOR 2nd rd pick
Tiago Splitter (dead money) $8,250,000
Kendall Marshall (dead money) $770,000
Post Trade Salary - $48,815,680
Brian Scalabrine
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Dec 30, 2016 20:02:29 GMT -5
Accept. I don't have much assets to move for future firsts, so leveraging my cap space and using dead money is a good move for me. Also, the Bosh contract will come off the books later this season, so we'll have cap space again.
|
|
Pete Maravich
Washington Wizards
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 772
Total Bank: 55,000
|
Post by Pete Maravich on Dec 30, 2016 20:07:33 GMT -5
|
|
billy
 Miami Heat
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 6,145
Total Bank: 3,050
|
Post by billy on Dec 30, 2016 20:10:16 GMT -5
Accept for BC
|
|
|
|
Post by Justin Timberlake on Dec 30, 2016 20:12:39 GMT -5
Accept.
Well done, Pete. Somehow made a profit on the Chandler contract.
That Boston pick could be interesting too.
|
|
|
|
Post by Colin Loftin on Dec 30, 2016 20:24:25 GMT -5
Accept
|
|
|
|
Post by Keith Van Horn on Dec 30, 2016 23:07:15 GMT -5
Yes take 19 million now, and 62 million over 3 years for a pick 4 drafts from now. Makes a lot of sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Dec 30, 2016 23:14:08 GMT -5
Yes take 19 million now, and 62 million over 3 years for a pick 4 drafts from now. Makes a lot of sense. Damn, all those flavors out there and you choose to be salty. |
|
billy
Miami Heat
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 6,145
Total Bank: 3,050
|
Post by billy on Dec 30, 2016 23:22:50 GMT -5
Yes take 19 million now, and 62 million over 3 years for a pick 4 drafts from now. Makes a lot of sense. Have you seen his team? Or do you just comment without context? |
|
|
|
Post by kong on Dec 30, 2016 23:35:38 GMT -5
I like this deal for Raptors. They are in a very early rebuilding stage and they probably could not make a better use of that cap space. And they embraced tanking in such a way this season that Chandler wont make a difference.
It should be noted though that the Celtics pick is top 3 protected. It is not specified anywhere in the thread.
|
|
billy
Miami Heat
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 6,145
Total Bank: 3,050
|
Post by billy on Dec 30, 2016 23:40:14 GMT -5
I like this deal for Raptors. They are in a very early rebuilding stage and they probably could not make a better use of that cap space. And they embraced tanking in such a way this season that Chandler wont make a difference. It should be noted though that the Celtics pick is top 3 protected. It is not specified anywhere in the thread. Thanks, Bowie! Brian Scalabrine You do realize that the pick is Top 3 protected -- correct? |
|
Red Auerbach
 Boston Celtics
Posts: 531
Likes: 309
Total Bank: 37,000
|
Post by Red Auerbach on Dec 30, 2016 23:43:15 GMT -5
It won't be a Top 3 pick, so everything should be alright.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Dec 30, 2016 23:43:34 GMT -5
I like this deal for Raptors. They are in a very early rebuilding stage and they probably could not make a better use of that cap space. And they embraced tanking in such a way this season that Chandler wont make a difference. It should be noted though that the Celtics pick is top 3 protected. It is not specified anywhere in the thread. Thanks, Bowie! Brian Scalabrine You do realize that the pick is Top 3 protected -- correct? Totally realize its top 3 protected! |
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Dec 30, 2016 23:45:37 GMT -5
It won't be a Top 3 pick, so everything should be alright. Yeah, top ten but not top three would be perfect. |
|
|
|
Post by Keith Van Horn on Dec 31, 2016 2:31:07 GMT -5
Yes take 19 million now, and 62 million over 3 years for a pick 4 drafts from now. Makes a lot of sense. Have you seen his team? Or do you just comment without context? So context matters now? Is there a method as to when it applies and when does not apply? On the surface, this trade is awful. |
|
|
|
Post by Keith Van Horn on Dec 31, 2016 2:33:00 GMT -5
Yes take 19 million now, and 62 million over 3 years for a pick 4 drafts from now. Makes a lot of sense. Damn, all those flavors out there and you choose to be salty. It seems to be the only thing on the menu. |
|
billy
Miami Heat
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 6,145
Total Bank: 3,050
|
Post by billy on Dec 31, 2016 8:29:45 GMT -5
Have you seen his team? Or do you just comment without context? So context matters now? Is there a method as to when it applies and when does not apply? On the surface, this trade is awful. No, it isn't awful. And you would see why if you looked at his team. |
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Dec 31, 2016 13:49:37 GMT -5
So context matters now? Is there a method as to when it applies and when does not apply? On the surface, this trade is awful. No, it isn't awful. And you would see why if you looked at his team. Thanks fam. |
|
|
|
Post by Keith Van Horn on Dec 31, 2016 22:09:27 GMT -5
So context matters now? Is there a method as to when it applies and when does not apply? On the surface, this trade is awful. No, it isn't awful. And you would see why if you looked at his team. Looking at his team is the context. His team's circumstances allow this trade to be thought of as good. But it is not a fair trade. The value from one end does not equal the value on the other. It is only because his team's situation that it is accepted. And that is my point of this. That in my trade with Doc and Pete, you were looking at the value of the players involved. Not the context surrounding the situation. |
|
billy
Miami Heat
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 6,145
Total Bank: 3,050
|
Post by billy on Dec 31, 2016 22:11:43 GMT -5
No, it isn't awful. And you would see why if you looked at his team. Looking at his team is the context. His team's circumstances allow this trade to be thought of as good. But it is not a fair trade. The value from one end does not equal the value on the other. It is only because his team's situation that it is accepted. And that is my point of this. That in my trade with Doc and Pete, you were looking at the value of the players involved. Not the context surrounding the situation. We definitely looked at the context of the trade, the context is like 60% of why it was rejected. |
|
|
|
Post by Keith Van Horn on Dec 31, 2016 22:13:34 GMT -5
Looking at his team is the context. His team's circumstances allow this trade to be thought of as good. But it is not a fair trade. The value from one end does not equal the value on the other. It is only because his team's situation that it is accepted. And that is my point of this. That in my trade with Doc and Pete, you were looking at the value of the players involved. Not the context surrounding the situation. We definitely looked at the context of the trade, the context is like 60% of why it was rejected. Whatever. If you say so, sir. |
|
|
|
Post by kong on Dec 31, 2016 22:17:18 GMT -5
Chandler was a poor fit for the Clippers.
|
|
|
|
Post by kong on Dec 31, 2016 22:18:14 GMT -5
Chandler was a poor fit for the Clippers.
|
|
Toronto Raptors
Phoenix Suns
