Paul Pierce
Chicago Bulls
Posts: 2,818
Likes: 1,143
Total Bank: 6,050
|
Post by Paul Pierce on May 18, 2017 20:31:30 GMT -5
current rating 64 8ppg 11.5 rpg and .5 bpg in 47 games on an awful team. needs decrease
|
|
|
Post by kong on May 18, 2017 21:39:50 GMT -5
nah
|
|
|
Post by Julius Erving on May 19, 2017 12:51:48 GMT -5
eh, not sure about him. I think he's still decent?
|
|
Paul Pierce
Chicago Bulls
Posts: 2,818
Likes: 1,143
Total Bank: 6,050
|
Post by Paul Pierce on May 19, 2017 13:49:50 GMT -5
eh, not sure about him. I think he's still decent? 64 isn't decent, a 64 is a pretty good starter. He's not better than guys like capela who are rated lower. He's declinef
|
|
|
Post by kong on May 19, 2017 17:11:54 GMT -5
64 is fine. There are other bigs that should be decreased before Chandler. Capela got a 63 but that doesn't mean he wont get a 64 soon enough. It is just how the stockwatch works. He was stockwatched some weeks ago but if he is stockwatched again he would get a 64 or 65 (as in other recent cases).
|
|
Steve Jobs
Oklahoma City Thunder
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 2,107
Total Bank: 50,500
|
Post by Steve Jobs on May 20, 2017 9:45:25 GMT -5
64 is fine. There are other bigs that should be decreased before Chandler. Capela got a 63 but that doesn't mean he wont get a 64 soon enough. It is just how the stockwatch works. He was stockwatched some weeks ago but if he is stockwatched again he would get a 64 or 65 (as in other recent cases). Chandler is barely a 60 if he is one at all, this argument is absurd.
|
|
Paul Pierce
Chicago Bulls
Posts: 2,818
Likes: 1,143
Total Bank: 6,050
|
Post by Paul Pierce on May 20, 2017 10:27:40 GMT -5
64 is fine. There are other bigs that should be decreased before Chandler. Capela got a 63 but that doesn't mean he wont get a 64 soon enough. It is just how the stockwatch works. He was stockwatched some weeks ago but if he is stockwatched again he would get a 64 or 65 (as in other recent cases). Chandler is barely a 60 if he is one at all, this argument is absurd. thank you!
|
|
|
Post by kong on May 20, 2017 10:57:58 GMT -5
then, what rating should players like Len (62), Frye (63), Gibson (66) get. There are more.
|
|
Paul Pierce
Chicago Bulls
Posts: 2,818
Likes: 1,143
Total Bank: 6,050
|
Post by Paul Pierce on May 20, 2017 11:11:00 GMT -5
then, what rating should players like Len (62), Frye (63), Gibson (66) get. There are more. they should be lowered too, but chandler played half the games this year and didn't play that good tbh
|
|
Steve Jobs
Oklahoma City Thunder
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 2,107
Total Bank: 50,500
|
Post by Steve Jobs on May 20, 2017 13:04:14 GMT -5
then, what rating should players like Len (62), Frye (63), Gibson (66) get. There are more. If I voted today: Len = 60, Frye = 61, Gibson = 61.
|
|