|
|
Post by Penny Hardaway on Jul 3, 2018 8:31:18 GMT -5
Miami Trades
Pick 39
For
Golden State trades:
55
2020 PHX 2nd
GSW 2021 2nd
GSW 2022 2nd
Warriors agree we have a player we like now vs holding on to future picks
|
|
|
|
Post by Jamario Moon on Jul 3, 2018 8:46:53 GMT -5
Accept, no one really caught my eye at this point in the draft so why not get a few assets for my pick
|
|
Theodore Duncan
 Portland Trail Blazers
Posts: 1,636 
Likes: 1,414
Total Bank: 57,500
|
Post by Theodore Duncan on Jul 3, 2018 9:32:07 GMT -5
Ehh.. very shortsided move for GSW in my opinion. Those extra 2nd rounders could have become handy when you try to move any of the bad salaries in the future.
But it's still only seconds, so accept.
|
|
Steve Jobs
 Oklahoma City Thunder
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 2,107
Total Bank: 50,500
|
Post by Steve Jobs on Jul 3, 2018 9:44:31 GMT -5
No offense... 2nds are BASICALLY worthless, but the fact that you managed to find the exact point at which I don't think I can accept a deal involving only 2nds is inspiring.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stuff The Magic Dragon on Jul 3, 2018 9:58:05 GMT -5
lmao, a 2nd for four 2nds, sounds retarded but ok
reject
|
|
|
|
Post by John Stockton on Jul 3, 2018 9:58:28 GMT -5
No offense... 2nds are BASICALLY worthless, but the fact that you managed to find the exact point at which I don't think I can accept a deal involving only 2nds is inspiring. GSW is trading on of their 1sts too. obvious reject from me. |
|
Walt Frazier
 Sacramento Kings
Posts: 291
Likes: 222
Total Bank: 16,000
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jul 3, 2018 10:02:14 GMT -5
One future 2nd for a current 2nd is probably fine. This is a "stacked class with good depth" (which I will say, this time of year, that is said pretty often...), so adding another 2nd is still acceptable.
4 is too many.
Reject
|
|
Jackie Kong
Posts: 2,287
Likes: 2,077
Total Bank: 76,050
|
Post by Jackie Kong on Jul 3, 2018 10:30:48 GMT -5
I am fine with this. Warriors are giving more 2nds than needed but 39th is on the clock so they are trading unknown 2nd rounders for a player they probably like a lot. Kuzma went 41 last year so if Penny thinks he can get something close to that then I think it is worth the gamble.
|
|
|
|
Post by Penny Hardaway on Jul 3, 2018 10:42:31 GMT -5
Come on seriously im trading phx 2020 probably will be in the late 50's so will be my picks..... The most valuable pick is 39 for me and we can easily get back 2nds in deals if we really need to and if tjey are so valuable how come everyone is saying no to them when i been trying to move up
|
|
|
|
Post by Penny Hardaway on Jul 3, 2018 10:44:20 GMT -5
One future 2nd for a current 2nd is probably fine. This is a "stacked class with good depth" (which I will say, this time of year, that is said pretty often...), so adding another 2nd is still acceptable. 4 is too many. Reject But you wouldnt do the deal but reject it because its too much? Sounds like you valued the player at 38 more then the picks , why cant i feel the same? |
|
|
|
Post by Penny Hardaway on Jul 3, 2018 10:45:22 GMT -5
No offense... 2nds are BASICALLY worthless, but the fact that you managed to find the exact point at which I don't think I can accept a deal involving only 2nds is inspiring. GSW is trading on of their 1sts too. obvious reject from me. What 1st? We are trading nothing but 2nds all later then 39 |
|
Paul Pierce
 Chicago Bulls
Posts: 2,818
Likes: 1,143
Total Bank: 6,050
|
Post by Paul Pierce on Jul 3, 2018 10:45:23 GMT -5
Reject
|
|
|
|
Post by Ron Artest(1x Champ) on Jul 3, 2018 10:49:10 GMT -5
Whoever you’re drafting isn’t that good to make up for giving up 3 extra seconds which will come in handy down the line. Reject for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Penny Hardaway on Jul 3, 2018 10:55:27 GMT -5
Whatever this is ridiculous i have 2nds that are in the late 50's but i cant trade them because they are too valuable.....
What if person i want was draft in first round by an nba team who knows talent better then any us? Wouldnt you think he is worht 4 late late 2nds ?
|
|
Paul Pierce
Chicago Bulls
Posts: 2,818
Likes: 1,143
Total Bank: 6,050
|
Post by Paul Pierce on Jul 3, 2018 11:02:10 GMT -5
Whatever this is ridiculous i have 2nds that are in the late 50's but i cant trade them because they are too valuable..... What if person i want was draft in first round by an nba team who knows talent better then any us? Wouldnt you think he is worht 4 late late 2nds ? I'll change mine to an accept. Do your thing, overpay. |
|
|
|
Post by Jamario Moon on Jul 3, 2018 11:33:24 GMT -5
No offense... 2nds are BASICALLY worthless, but the fact that you managed to find the exact point at which I don't think I can accept a deal involving only 2nds is inspiring. GSW is trading on of their 1sts too. obvious reject from me. There are no firsts moving here |
|
|
|
Post by Penny Hardaway on Jul 3, 2018 11:42:30 GMT -5
No offense... 2nds are BASICALLY worthless, but the fact that you managed to find the exact point at which I don't think I can accept a deal involving only 2nds is inspiring. Non taken like you said they are worthless, dont understand why this is even such a big deal he gave me shit i give him more shit back its not like im trading a 1st or even a player. Im trading future 2nds guys and the 2nds are from playoff teams not even high 2nds. Just like everyone else we offered this trade too that said no because they wanted to draft someone they thought was more valuable. Im doing the exact same thing i value someone more then those picks but its funny because now they vote reject... And another person I forgot what pick it was but i offered 3 future 2nds and jordan hill for pick 30 something. He turns around and trades it for just 2 future 2nds.... Thats how valuable my 2nds are... |
|
|
|
Post by Brown Cobb IV on Jul 3, 2018 12:03:24 GMT -5
Accept. Not franchise ruining.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Jul 3, 2018 12:24:48 GMT -5
Whatever this is ridiculous i have 2nds that are in the late 50's but i cant trade them because they are too valuable..... What if person i want was draft in first round by an nba team who knows talent better then any us? Wouldnt you think he is worht 4 late late 2nds ? Seems like you're talking about Moritz Wagner, who, imo is not worth it because he can't defend anyone in the league. But, even as the biggest slut in this league for seconds I'll accept this deal. GSW is right that a low second almost never moves the needle on a trade--and as much as I dislike Wagner as a prospect, taking a guy in the second who went in the first is usually a good idea. With the payroll on GSW being so tight, he's smart to try to get some talent through the draft. Unfortunately Wagner will be booty, but the idea isn't bad. It's not his fault that I already took the best guys in the 2nd. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2018 12:28:54 GMT -5
Accept
Its alot of 2nds but their low tier in the future picks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Penny Hardaway on Jul 3, 2018 12:42:19 GMT -5
Whatever this is ridiculous i have 2nds that are in the late 50's but i cant trade them because they are too valuable..... What if person i want was draft in first round by an nba team who knows talent better then any us? Wouldnt you think he is worht 4 late late 2nds ? Seems like you're talking about Moritz Wagner, who, imo is not worth it because he can't defend anyone in the league. But, even as the biggest slut in this league for seconds I'll accept this deal. GSW is right that a low second almost never moves the needle on a trade--and as much as I dislike Wagner as a prospect, taking a guy in the second who went in the first is usually a good idea. With the payroll on GSW being so tight, he's smart to try to get some talent through the draft. Unfortunately Wagner will be booty, but the idea isn't bad. It's not his fault that I already took the best guys in the 2nd. Your correct! And that's your right to judge him thats why we are different gm's, but we think he will be a good role player at worst and for us and yes getting good quality cheap players to fill out our roster is ideal. We are thrilled with this pick up and can be done with this draft. I'll remember that booty comment btw and hope you can admit when you are wrong because i know i can, see you in about 6months.... |
|
Paul Pierce
Chicago Bulls
Posts: 2,818
Likes: 1,143
Total Bank: 6,050
|
Post by Paul Pierce on Jul 3, 2018 12:49:36 GMT -5
Seems like you're talking about Moritz Wagner, who, imo is not worth it because he can't defend anyone in the league. But, even as the biggest slut in this league for seconds I'll accept this deal. GSW is right that a low second almost never moves the needle on a trade--and as much as I dislike Wagner as a prospect, taking a guy in the second who went in the first is usually a good idea. With the payroll on GSW being so tight, he's smart to try to get some talent through the draft. Unfortunately Wagner will be booty, but the idea isn't bad. It's not his fault that I already took the best guys in the 2nd. Your correct! And that's your right to judge him thats why we are different gm's, but we think he will be a good role player at worst and for us and yes getting good quality cheap players to fill out our roster is ideal. We are thrilled with this pick up and can be done with this draft. I'll remember that booty comment btw and hope you can admit when you are wrong because i know i can, see you in about 6months.... 6 years* can't go by a players rookie season |
|
|
|
Post by Jamario Moon on Jul 3, 2018 14:47:53 GMT -5
So trade passed?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2018 15:36:12 GMT -5
5-4 trade passed
|
|
|
|
Post by Tracy McGrady on Jul 4, 2018 6:45:46 GMT -5
I think too late, but I accept.
|
|
Orlando Magic
LA Lakers
Toronto Raptors
