|
MIN-GSW
Jul 22, 2018 10:23:50 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2018 10:23:50 GMT -5
Minnesota Gets: (58)Marcus Smart $6,053,718 (52)Troy Brown jr $1,645,400 $1,927,100 $2,018,800 $3,320,926 $4,808,701
Golden State Gets: (63)Roodney Hood $3,427,887 Tiago splitter (DC) $2,300,000 2020 Chicago 1st Round Top 3 Protected
|
|
|
MIN-GSW
Jul 22, 2018 10:29:35 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2018 10:29:35 GMT -5
Minnesota accepts I think hood could do very well in cleveland if he stays, but he could also do what he usually does be erratic, and stay hurt. Also dont like giving up a 1st but by 2020 i feel the bulls will be improved so im going to use it here on tbj who after watching him over sl i think has all the potential in the world and is still only 18! I also love marcus smart gritty, tough, in your face defensive that just plain bothers people and rattles their cages. He just has that swag about him that we love!! Good dealing gsw
|
|
|
MIN-GSW
Jul 22, 2018 10:31:04 GMT -5
Post by Penny Hardaway on Jul 22, 2018 10:31:04 GMT -5
Warriors agree we like hoods game more and landing the pick helps us move it to find a replacement pg. Hate tp se troy jr go though but with hood we have a better backup gf now
|
|
|
MIN-GSW
Jul 22, 2018 13:17:50 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2018 13:17:50 GMT -5
Can we get some votes here pls before rfa-2 starts!
|
|
Paul Pierce
Chicago Bulls
Posts: 2,818
Likes: 1,143
Total Bank: 6,050
|
MIN-GSW
Jul 22, 2018 13:30:24 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Paul Pierce on Jul 22, 2018 13:30:24 GMT -5
Accept, my team should be a playoff team by then so that pick isn't crazy good. Smart for good is fair value
|
|
Walt Frazier
Sacramento Kings
Posts: 291
Likes: 222
Total Bank: 16,000
|
MIN-GSW
Jul 22, 2018 15:13:05 GMT -5
Post by Walt Frazier on Jul 22, 2018 15:13:05 GMT -5
#1 - Who's Roodney Hood?
#2 - Don't we need ratings on trade threads? Or, am I stuck in D5 land?
|
|
|
MIN-GSW
Jul 22, 2018 15:17:34 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2018 15:17:34 GMT -5
Why put ratings when were changing next year and there will be new ones
|
|
Walt Frazier
Sacramento Kings
Posts: 291
Likes: 222
Total Bank: 16,000
|
MIN-GSW
Jul 22, 2018 15:18:36 GMT -5
Post by Walt Frazier on Jul 22, 2018 15:18:36 GMT -5
Just asking what the rules are.
If we're pausing the rules right now, cool. Just asking.
|
|
Paul Pierce
Chicago Bulls
Posts: 2,818
Likes: 1,143
Total Bank: 6,050
|
MIN-GSW
Jul 22, 2018 15:25:07 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Paul Pierce on Jul 22, 2018 15:25:07 GMT -5
Just asking what the rules are. If we're pausing the rules right now, cool. Just asking. you need to post ratings, he just made that rule up that we don't post them.
|
|
Steve Jobs
Oklahoma City Thunder
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 2,107
Total Bank: 50,500
|
MIN-GSW
Jul 22, 2018 15:40:52 GMT -5
Post by Steve Jobs on Jul 22, 2018 15:40:52 GMT -5
Just asking what the rules are. If we're pausing the rules right now, cool. Just asking. you need to post ratings, he just made that rule up that we don't post them. In fairness, he's right... we're not suspending needing to post ratings, but the ratings are already somewhat inaccurate on the whole (between the first sim system change and neglecting the SW to an extent) and they will be changing again soon, so the voting needs to be based off of knowledge of the players rather than rating/contract types of valuations.
|
|
Paul Pierce
Chicago Bulls
Posts: 2,818
Likes: 1,143
Total Bank: 6,050
|
Post by Paul Pierce on Jul 22, 2018 15:44:27 GMT -5
you need to post ratings, he just made that rule up that we don't post them. In fairness, he's right... we're not suspending needing to post ratings, but the ratings are already somewhat inaccurate on the whole (between the first sim system change and neglecting the SW to an extent) and they will be changing again soon, so the voting needs to be based off of knowledge of the players rather than rating/contract types of valuations. well yeah but ratings need to always be posted.
|
|
Steve Jobs
Oklahoma City Thunder
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 2,107
Total Bank: 50,500
|
MIN-GSW
Jul 22, 2018 15:52:31 GMT -5
Post by Steve Jobs on Jul 22, 2018 15:52:31 GMT -5
In fairness, he's right... we're not suspending needing to post ratings, but the ratings are already somewhat inaccurate on the whole (between the first sim system change and neglecting the SW to an extent) and they will be changing again soon, so the voting needs to be based off of knowledge of the players rather than rating/contract types of valuations. well yeah but ratings need to always be posted. Meh, the ratings are virtually meaningless at this point. The letter of the law is "every trade posted must include each player's ratings," but the intention of the rule is to provide as much information as possible about the players. If we're demanding that these particular ratings get posted, it's not THAT much different than arbitrarily assigning values to each player in the trade.
|
|
Paul Pierce
Chicago Bulls
Posts: 2,818
Likes: 1,143
Total Bank: 6,050
|
MIN-GSW
Jul 22, 2018 15:54:58 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Paul Pierce on Jul 22, 2018 15:54:58 GMT -5
well yeah but ratings need to always be posted. Meh, the ratings are virtually meaningless at this point. The letter of the law is "every trade posted must include each player's ratings," but the intention of the rule is to provide as much information as possible about the players. If we're demanding that these particular ratings get posted, it's not THAT much different than arbitrarily assigning values to each player in the trade. the rating shows these two are similarly rated players on similar contracts. The ratings help. It won't be that huge if a difference in the new versiin
|
|
Steve Jobs
Oklahoma City Thunder
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 2,107
Total Bank: 50,500
|
Post by Steve Jobs on Jul 22, 2018 15:57:21 GMT -5
Meh, the ratings are virtually meaningless at this point. The letter of the law is "every trade posted must include each player's ratings," but the intention of the rule is to provide as much information as possible about the players. If we're demanding that these particular ratings get posted, it's not THAT much different than arbitrarily assigning values to each player in the trade. the rating shows these two are similarly rated players on similar contracts. The ratings help. It won't be that huge if a difference in the new versiin Right, but the point is if the ratings aren't that accurate, there is no guarantee that they DO show similar players. The ratings help, but the voters should be knowledgeable enough to make valid decisions without them, especially in moments where the ratings are in limbo.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2018 15:58:00 GMT -5
Who cares on the board right now are 3 trades that all need to be voted on not to mention the 3 prior none of which have ratings
|
|
Walt Frazier
Sacramento Kings
Posts: 291
Likes: 222
Total Bank: 16,000
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jul 22, 2018 16:22:48 GMT -5
I honestly never vote on ratings anyway, I just like rules to be followed. Again, if we're pausing that rule b/c we're switching systems, cool, just would want to hear that from the commish.
|
|
|
MIN-GSW
Jul 22, 2018 16:27:38 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2018 16:27:38 GMT -5
Ratings added
|
|
Walt Frazier
Sacramento Kings
Posts: 291
Likes: 222
Total Bank: 16,000
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jul 22, 2018 16:48:50 GMT -5
I think Smart is probably worth more than Hood. I don't think Brown is worth that 1st on his own but it's not THAT bad overall.
Accept, all things considered.
|
|
|
MIN-GSW
Jul 22, 2018 16:57:49 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Stuff The Magic Dragon on Jul 22, 2018 16:57:49 GMT -5
is it ok to trade QOs
|
|
Pete Maravich
Washington Wizards
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 772
Total Bank: 55,000
|
MIN-GSW
Jul 22, 2018 17:40:21 GMT -5
Post by Pete Maravich on Jul 22, 2018 17:40:21 GMT -5
|
|
Steve Jobs
Oklahoma City Thunder
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 2,107
Total Bank: 50,500
|
MIN-GSW
Jul 22, 2018 18:41:09 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Steve Jobs on Jul 22, 2018 18:41:09 GMT -5
Only RFAs have QOs. But yes. haha
|
|
Pete Maravich
Washington Wizards
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 772
Total Bank: 55,000
|
MIN-GSW
Jul 22, 2018 19:01:07 GMT -5
Post by Pete Maravich on Jul 22, 2018 19:01:07 GMT -5
Only RFAs have QOs. But yes. haha Wow. Don't know why but my brain was thinking cap holds.
|
|
|
MIN-GSW
Jul 22, 2018 21:04:43 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2018 21:04:43 GMT -5
It is 2-0 can we get the proper votes please since this involves 2 tier-2 rfas And os very important to mine and pennys negotiations!
|
|
|
MIN-GSW
Jul 22, 2018 21:13:16 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Tracy McGrady on Jul 22, 2018 21:13:16 GMT -5
Let me help. Accept.
|
|
|
MIN-GSW
Jul 23, 2018 2:08:26 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Jul 23, 2018 2:08:26 GMT -5
I'll accept. I'm looking at this like an RFA for an RFA (though imo smart is better) and a first for a first since Brown was just drafted. That's fine I guess.
|
|
Theodore Duncan
Portland Trail Blazers
Posts: 1,636
Likes: 1,414
Total Bank: 57,500
|
Post by Theodore Duncan on Jul 23, 2018 2:34:40 GMT -5
Accept. Value is even enough
|
|
|
MIN-GSW
Jul 23, 2018 4:31:36 GMT -5
Post by Penny Hardaway on Jul 23, 2018 4:31:36 GMT -5
Thats 5 accepts think it safe to bid on my new rfa.
|
|