Pete Maravich
 Washington Wizards
Posts: 1,264 
Likes: 772
Total Bank: 55,000
|
Post by Pete Maravich on Jun 23, 2018 20:40:46 GMT -5
CHI sends
'18 LAC 2nd (37)
'21 CHI 2nd
Devin Harris (dead money) $4,402,546
Jodie Meeks (dead money) $990,000
CHI receives
Jae Crowder $6,000,000 $6,500,000 $7,000,000
'18 WAS 2nd (51)
Total Salary - $6.00M/$5.39M (11.3%)
GSW sends
'22 LAL 1st
Jae Crowder $6,000,000 $6,500,000 $7,000,000
GSW receives
Marcus Smart $4,538,019 $6,053,718
Total Salary - Receiving less salary ($4.54M) than outgoing ($6.00M)
WAS sends
Marcus Smart $4,538,019 $6,053,718
'18 WAS 2nd (51)
WAS receives
'22 LAL 1st
'18 LAC 2nd (37)
'21 CHI 2nd
Devin Harris (dead money) $4,402,546
Jodie Meeks (dead money) $990,000
Total Salary - Incoming $5.39M/$4.54M (18.7%)
|
|
|
|
Post by Penny Hardaway on Jun 23, 2018 20:43:26 GMT -5
Gsw agree
|
|
Pete Maravich
Washington Wizards
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 772
Total Bank: 55,000
|
Post by Pete Maravich on Jun 23, 2018 20:44:12 GMT -5
I accept pending approval of the LAL/GSW deal & Paul Pierce still being active after our work. Same reasoning. Gaining assets while not affecting cap space & gaining a roster spot for FA. Paul Pierce |
|
Jackie Kong
Posts: 2,287
Likes: 2,077
Total Bank: 76,050
|
Post by Jackie Kong on Jun 23, 2018 20:45:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Penny Hardaway on Jun 23, 2018 20:49:38 GMT -5
|
|
Paul Pierce
 Chicago Bulls
Posts: 2,818
Likes: 1,143
Total Bank: 6,050
|
Post by Paul Pierce on Jun 23, 2018 20:50:54 GMT -5
If Billy would let me be back after me overreacting the I accept
|
|
Jackie Kong
Posts: 2,287
Likes: 2,077
Total Bank: 76,050
|
Post by Jackie Kong on Jun 23, 2018 20:53:42 GMT -5
Nah, no way this should be accepted if you get a free 2nd out from what happened. Knowing Lakers could not trade the 2019 1st was Lakers' responsibility but also yours. Both the 'Rules' and 'Draft Rights' are right there in the navbar.
|
|
|
|
Post by Penny Hardaway on Jun 23, 2018 20:57:34 GMT -5
Nah, no way this should be accepted if you get a free 2nd out from what happened. Knowing Lakers could not trade the 2019 1st was Lakers' responsibility but also yours. Both the 'Rules' and 'Draft Rights' are right there in the navbar. i doubt anybody double checks someone if they offwr you a pick you figure they know if they have or can trade it bu either way its Ok.....doesnt matter to me i told him he can have the 2018 he told me to keep it. Only reason the 2018 2nd was even added to orginal trade was because he didnt want to let his 2019 1st go so i added it. But since i have to take a 2022 1st and he keeps his 2019 1st i took back my 2018 2nd. |
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Jun 23, 2018 20:58:03 GMT -5
Nah, no way this should be accepted if you get a free 2nd out from what happened. Knowing Lakers could not trade the 2019 1st was Lakers' responsibility but also yours. Both the 'Rules' and 'Draft Rights' are right there in the navbar. Long laying down the law |
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Jun 23, 2018 20:58:19 GMT -5
Nah, no way this should be accepted if you get a free 2nd out from what happened. Knowing Lakers could not trade the 2019 1st was Lakers' responsibility but also yours. Both the 'Rules' and 'Draft Rights' are right there in the navbar. Long laying down the law *Kong |
|
|
|
Post by Penny Hardaway on Jun 23, 2018 21:01:05 GMT -5
Nah, no way this should be accepted if you get a free 2nd out from what happened. Knowing Lakers could not trade the 2019 1st was Lakers' responsibility but also yours. Both the 'Rules' and 'Draft Rights' are right there in the navbar. Long laying down the law All for 2nd too .... My goodness like i wasn't losing the trade already by settling for 2022 1st. Luckly Pete worked with me thats why i offered it to him. |
|
Jackie Kong
Posts: 2,287
Likes: 2,077
Total Bank: 76,050
|
Post by Jackie Kong on Jun 23, 2018 21:16:28 GMT -5
My goodness like i wasn't losing the trade already by settling for 2022 1st. Pete had to settle for the LAL 2022 1st instead of the LAL 2019 1st. He is the one getting that pick. Hence, he should also get the 2018 2nd Round Pick(OKC) that was originally going to Lakers.  |
|
|
|
Post by Penny Hardaway on Jun 23, 2018 21:19:13 GMT -5
My goodness like i wasn't losing the trade already by settling for 2022 1st. Pete had to settle for the LAL 2022 1st instead of the LAL 2019 1st. He is the one getting that pick. Hence, he should also get the 2018 2nd Round Pick(OKC) that was originally going to Lakers. Pete had the right to not even do the trade if he didnt want too nobody pressures him to redo it and we could have reworked it out however we wanted BUT we Offered the 2nd to him he didn'T want it, he was fine without it, what do you want me to do shove it down his throat? |
|
Jackie Kong
Posts: 2,287
Likes: 2,077
Total Bank: 76,050
|
Post by Jackie Kong on Jun 23, 2018 21:34:01 GMT -5
we Offered the 2nd to him he didn'T want it Why wouldn’t you want a free 2nd??? Brian Scalabrine would do so many different things for a free 2nd that it is almost embarrassing. |
|
|
|
Post by Penny Hardaway on Jun 23, 2018 21:37:11 GMT -5
we Offered the 2nd to him he didn'T want it Why wouldn’t you want a free 2nd??? Brian Scalabrine would do so many different things for a free 2nd that it is almost embarrassing. From my understanding frustration as he just wants this done and over with... I feel him. Sorry if im coming across wrong just seems its always something stopping a trade. |
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Jun 23, 2018 21:44:57 GMT -5
we Offered the 2nd to him he didn'T want it Why wouldn’t you want a free 2nd??? Brian Scalabrine would do so many different things for a free 2nd that it is almost embarrassing. In case anyone was wondering, Sindarius Thornwell, Jawun Evans, Quinn Cook, Shabazz Napier, Tyrone Wallace all available for 2nds. |
|
billy
 Miami Heat
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 6,145
Total Bank: 3,050
|
Post by billy on Jun 24, 2018 7:05:43 GMT -5
If Billy would let me be back after me overreacting the I accept You have to be in timeout for at least one week! And no worries, PP. “He who is without sin cast the first stone”. |
|
|
|
Post by Ron Artest(1x Champ) on Jun 24, 2018 7:07:41 GMT -5
Nah, no way this should be accepted if you get a free 2nd out from what happened. Knowing Lakers could not trade the 2019 1st was Lakers' responsibility but also yours. Both the 'Rules' and 'Draft Rights' are right there in the navbar. Dude for one I’m not the manager that decided to trade god knows how many picks away to only end up with Klay Thompson as his best player... Secondly, there is a committee that completely missed that we missed that rule. It was a collective fuck up. Wait why do you have say so if you aren’t a gm again? Didn’t you quit like chicago’s GM in a fit of rage, MULTIPLE times or am I confusing you with someone. |
|
billy
Miami Heat
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 6,145
Total Bank: 3,050
|
Post by billy on Jun 24, 2018 7:08:37 GMT -5
Pete Maravich Why wouldn’t you want a free 2nd??? Brian Scalabrine would do so many different things for a free 2nd that it is almost embarrassing. From my understanding frustration as he just wants this done and over with... I feel him. Sorry if im coming across wrong just seems its always something stopping a trade. The rules are complex but they are there for a reason! Everyone is responsible for making sure the trade you are posting is legal. It’s not the leagues job to babysit the legality of your trades and if we don’t find out until later... well... it causes headaches for everyone, I brought Kong on a special counsel just to have an extra eye on this stuff and he has done admirably! Thanks to everyone for getting this all worked out, and be more careful next time. Trading your own pick 2years in a row should be an easy one to not make :) |
|
billy
Miami Heat
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 6,145
Total Bank: 3,050
|
Post by billy on Jun 24, 2018 7:35:51 GMT -5
Nah, no way this should be accepted if you get a free 2nd out from what happened. Knowing Lakers could not trade the 2019 1st was Lakers' responsibility but also yours. Both the 'Rules' and 'Draft Rights' are right there in the navbar. Dude for one I’m not the manager that decided to trade god knows how many picks away to only end up with Klay Thompson as his best player... Secondly, there is a committee that completely missed that we missed that rule. It was a collective fuck up. Wait why do you have say so if you aren’t a gm again? Didn’t you quit like chicago’s GM in a fit of rage, MULTIPLE times or am I confusing you with someone.  |
|
Jackie Kong
Posts: 2,287
Likes: 2,077
Total Bank: 76,050
|
Post by Jackie Kong on Jun 24, 2018 7:55:57 GMT -5
Ron Artest(1x Champ) I apologize if I offended you and yes everyone was responsible to a certain degree. Was just trying to make the point Warriors shouldn't be getting a free 2ND from this. Also, I didn't mean you were responsible. Actually, sort of the opposite. If you go through all the threads you will see you were sort of pointed as the main responsible for trading that pick and I was just saying the trade is made by 2 people or more. Not 1.
|
|
Jackie Kong
Posts: 2,287
Likes: 2,077
Total Bank: 76,050
|
Post by Jackie Kong on Jun 24, 2018 8:05:56 GMT -5
Also, the original Curry trade was really tricky from a rules point of view. It failed because Curry had a ntc, because an expiring contract was being traded and because of the consecutive picks. Those are not very common things to happen. The trading an expiring contract thing happens from time to time but NTCs are very rare and so is teams trading all their picks (I understand you didn't trade those). It is usually a good strategy to keep those just in case an emergency express rebuild is required.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stuff The Magic Dragon on Jun 24, 2018 8:23:07 GMT -5
shiver me trigger
|
|
|
|
Post by Penny Hardaway on Jun 24, 2018 8:26:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Stuff The Magic Dragon on Jun 26, 2018 8:20:41 GMT -5
updates on this guys and gals, thanks
|
|
Theodore Duncan
 Portland Trail Blazers
Posts: 1,636
Likes: 1,414
Total Bank: 57,500
|
Post by Theodore Duncan on Jun 26, 2018 8:26:17 GMT -5
This thread is confusing so I don't know if this is valid and should be voted or not. All I know is that one team here is getting fleeced. smh
|
|
Paul Pierce
Chicago Bulls
Posts: 2,818
Likes: 1,143
Total Bank: 6,050
|
Post by Paul Pierce on Jun 26, 2018 8:32:21 GMT -5
This thread is confusing so I don't know if this is valid and should be voted or not. All I know is that one team here is getting fleeced. smh it's a legal trade, who's getting fleeced? |
|
|
|
Post by Penny Hardaway on Jun 26, 2018 8:51:02 GMT -5
This thread is confusing so I don't know if this is valid and should be voted or not. All I know is that one team here is getting fleeced. smh Sure not 2 teams? |
|
Pete Maravich
Washington Wizards
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 772
Total Bank: 55,000
|
Post by Pete Maravich on Jun 26, 2018 9:21:08 GMT -5
This is the one that was downstream all the way from the Booker trade that held up multiple other trades since the '19 LAL 1st was not available for trade due to the Stepien rule. I got a bit of winner's curse trying to get it done & changing the pick from '19 to '22 wasn't great but it allowed all the other deals to go through so...it is what it is
|
|
|
|
Post by Penny Hardaway on Jun 26, 2018 10:05:30 GMT -5
I figured he thought i was getting fleeced for giving up a future 1st and Crowder in this deal....
|
|
Toronto Raptors
LA Lakers
Orlando Magic
